At face value, it may seem like deontology is the answer, but then the concept of universal moral truth is too vague to be relied upon. Deontology deals with intentions and motives. In some situations, we decide with our hearts, in other situations with our brains. (Wikipedia, 2015). Kant stated that a universal law should provide the basis for each act, and that the intention was of more importance than the result.

Unlike religious deontological … Another important difference between the two schools of thought regarding ethical behavior is that, utilitarianism is more consequence-oriented in character. Doing the right thing means to follow proper rules of behavior and, by doing so, promoting fairness and equality. Deontological ethics is an ethics system that judges whether an action is right or wrong based on a moral code. What happens when the situation is not black and white?In the other hand, utilitarian ethics state that a course of action should be taken by considering the most positive outcome.

Therefore, the benefits are maximized and the pain is minimized for all in this case.PSY 833: Ethics and Leadership (Buban) © 2020.
If you pull the lever, on person dies. In some situations we decide with our hearts, in other situations with our brains” ( Guzman, 2016).

Nonetheless, in this scenario the means of lying to get the loan, would justify the ends. Consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics are moral theories that evaluate morality on the basis of different factors. Not only that it directs individuals to do what is right or wrong; moreover, it makes them do what is in the best of their conscience.There are several schools of thought regarding morality. Utilitarianism (also called consequentialism) is a moral theory developed and refined in the modern world in the writings of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). Ethics depend on a moral framework. Morality has it tha people will justify or not the end and the means.

Not only that it directs individuals to do what is right or wrong; moreover, it makes them do …

It branches off of consequentualism. Morality has it tha people will justify or not the end and the means. You state that during childbirth, a doctor that follows deontology would attempt to save both the mother and child due to his belief that an action is right if it is morally ethical and the consequence of the result will not affect the decision. As a parent I have an obligation to protect my child, and I would say that there is no ethical framework that would disagree with this. I am given a situation where there are 7 people on a boat, and I have to decide who to push over in order to save the other. In contrast, it's easier to gauge the end result of an action by assessing its benefits.Proponents of utilitarian ethics will argue that saving many lives at the cost of one, is the right thing to do. Being human is part of the dilemma.I totally agree with reasoning the saving the child’s live would take preference over why the loan was needed. The trolley problem. The only thing one can be sure of is whether his or her actions are ethical or not based on the categorical imperative.

Deontologists, on the other hand, are repulsed by the idea of doing anything that is morally wrong ... leave alone taking someone's life.Now that shouldn't come as a surprise, considering that the latter is a form of consequentialism, which in itself is based on the belief that the consequence of an action determines whether it is right or wrong.Let's go through some examples to see the contrast in how these ethical systems work. In a hostage situation, a gunman picks an individual and asks him to kill a fellow hostage, and threatens to kill all hostages if the individual doesn't comply.Deontology holds that certain actions are immoral, no matter what their outcome is.