In Afghanistan sometimes you are shooting mountain to mountain. The military began using the 5.56 due to the weak recoil and that, subsequently, anyone with any background can easily shoot it and manage the recoil. The means of defence agst. Hundreds of German soldiers were attacking along with Panzers, coming down over a hill in open country.

!I don’t think this article is about the effectiveness (or lack of) the 5.56 round. If it was a pathetic 50% effective with the first shot, that would mean that half the stories would say it’s OK, the other half would say it sucked. Its also used by our Military to be able to carry more rounds and provide more cover fire downrange, not necessarily kill everything it hits. Just lazy I guess. And generally that’s true, with the exception of the AK-47 as the weapon is designed to just throw rounds down range with the accuracy of a 12ga shotgun. There is a reason for the 2nd amendment.If you think of me as a supporter of large standing armies and executive power manipulation to maintain such a beast in direct contradiction of our own constitution (like what is happening now), then you couldnt be more wrong.The USMC is a department of the Navy, the one military force that the Constitution gives permission to be maintained in times of both peace and war.They’re no longer sharpshooters in the rigging of sails in ship-to-ship actions.And don’t forget the October 1994 Marine questionnaire at the Twentynine Palms Marine Base in California, where recruits were asked 46 questions, including whether they would kill U.S. citizens who refused to surrender their firearms.Certainly their mission has changed. This Internet commando spent zero time in the Marines or any other branch. That’s how we do it. I know it's what I would choose. lol.Thank you for your service and your invaluable insight, Sir, and I anxiously look forward to reading more from you! I never liked the M-16 or the 5.56 mm round.

And don’t be too surprised at StannyMcC’s utterance, he’s just following in Stormin’ Norman & Colin Powell’s bootsteps. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment, I Annals of Congress at 750, August 17, 1789,And no, the Standing Army isn’t necessary for freedom, and doesn’t protect it. You want to bad mouth the USA’s initiative in this world then I would suggest you GTFO and go join the enemy.Depends on how you look at it.. 5.56, 9mm or 7.62 does not mean you will kill someone within 1 or 2 shots.. If the would have let u use a 308 he might not have been able to get so far. is deadly on prairie dogs, ground squirrels and gophers out past 400 yards. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.Copyright text 2015 by OutdoorHill. Once military approval was given, Remington launched a sporting version of the round on the civilian market as the .223 Remington.Nikon P-223 3-9×40 BDC 600 Rifle Scope – Best For Trouble Free And Accurate Shooting,How To Skin A Deer – Step By Step Guideline,» What You Need To Know About .22-250 Vs .223 Caliber,10 Best Oakley Radar Replacement Parts Reviews,10 Best Coconut Flavored Protein Powder Reviews,10 Best Elastipoxy Joint & Crack Filler Reviews. designed to perform optimally velocity wise by being fired out of a 20″ barrel.1.) They were not as effective, predictably, when facing a conventional army on the open battle.nobody is arguing against A standing army. was actually an experimental cartridge adapted by the U.S. Military in 1964. The muzzle flash also obscures your view of the target and destroys night vision, and this is where sound moderators really come into their own.Despite its age, the .22-250 continues to offer excellent performance and inherent accuracy to today’s shooters. In fact, it’s dangerously similar to “the Second Amendment was written back when all they had were muskets, they never imagined ‘assault weapons’!” To call for the disbanding of a unit provided for per the Constitution because technology has evolved around it is incredibly short sighted.Fact is, the Founders were very intelligent and had witnessed innovation and advancement in their own lives. Way to go; ya just let the cat out of the bag. Oh, and that guy up top,”wounded defecator” is a sissy like his daddy taught him to be.wouldn’t last 5minutes.liberal punk, f u.Recoil was not given as a reason for caliber change.After you educate yourself on the real reason, readily available in any number of sources, as to why EVERY relevant military on the planet has gone to a 5-6mm cartridge, we can have a discussion.So you were shooting at his torso, from a distance, and you assume you didn’t stop him because he was “on something” ??????? But they are claiming it took out a large deer.I see. Only thing that sucks is it costs close to a buck a round.M193 and M855 are good for plinking or range use (m855 even less so, which is why i have little of it), but there is a plethora of other options that are much much better.i would rather use 45 gr winchester HP than M855.Sounds like an updated (and rifle) version of the whole reason the 1911 was developed. In 1917 it was the Germans who weren’t kidnapping our sailors but killing them in u-boat attacks. The .223 Rem. Facts in view, you insist they must be wrong because you have an “opinion.”.Stop the presses, forget the nato .223 and go with the Valkyrie. If a war is worth fighting than the warrior is worth market rate for his services.As far as our foreign policy the precedent was set by one of the founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson when he sent the marines to the Barbary coast.

!Read Blackhawk Down sometime to see the dislike for the 5.56 expressed by some of the troops involved.In a way I am happy letting these idiots believe the 5.56 is too lethal. Just change the BCG and barrel design and you are off to the races.That’s a cool story, bro! This means the distance the rifling begins from the end of the case mouth in a 5.56 chamber is longer than it is in a .223 Rem. or a vest that slows the bullet. We haven’t seen any movement in that direction yet. Ooh Rah!Here in Florida we “ kill “ hogs with 556 and 223 in our AR15’s. Is this the way you answer to a experienced us marine sniper WOW shame on you.Felipe – I cannot understand ANYTHING you are attempting (poorly) to say.