In Bostock’s case, the … It’s another tragic defeat for the constitutional separation of powers, self-government, morality, truth, speech rights, and religious liberty. If you follow ...A 2019 study by the Pew Research Center compared generational views on key social and political issues, focusing on the similarities between Millennials and Generation Z. 1:16-cv-001460, 2016 WL 9753356; report and recommendation adopted, 2017 WL 4456898; affirmed sub nom. Pennsylvania GOP senator Pat Toomey blasted the decision in ...With the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court. In the ordinary sense, a stroller is not a vehicle, and in common parlance a cold war is a conflict short of open warfare.

This last item, ...President Trump said Saturday that Senate Republicans have an "obligation" to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death "without delay." In Altitude Express v. In earlier decisions, the Court refused a reading of “mineral deposits” that included water, even though water is literally a mineral.
Bostock v. Clayto…
Dissent, Alito [Alito Dissent] [PDF] ... Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia. The “concept of discrimination … was part of the campaign for equality that had been waged by women’s rights advocates for more than a century, and what it meant was equal treatment for men and women.”,The problem, then, is the ambiguity of plain meaning. Nonetheless, it is still a horrid jolt.Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, itself a product of the 14th Amendment, prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin. My favorite notion here is the Writ of Mandamus.Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.on About Brett Kavanaugh’s Dissent to Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia,Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window),Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window),About Brett Kavanaugh’s Dissent to Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia,Progressing the Declaration of Independence,Five Years Ago – Donald Trump’s Escalator Speech,A New Constitution for the Freest People on Earth Part I. Kavanaugh is following Scalia and Garner. Ordinary meaning is the decades-old standard in which courts interpret words according to their everyday, commonsense use. United States Supreme Court case Bostock v. Clayton County Supreme Court of the United States Argued October 8, 2019 Decided June 15, 2020 Full case nameGerald Lynn Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia Docket no.17-1618 Citations590 U.S. ___ 140 S. Ct. 1731; 2020 WL 3146686; 2020 U.S. LEXIS 3252 ArgumentOral argument Case history Prior Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., No. None of them included sexual orientation within the envelope of sex discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County: SCOTUS Rules 6-3 that Gay, ... ’ is different from discrimination because of ‘sexual orientation’ or ‘gender identity,’” Alito wrote in a dissent that was joined by Thomas.

But, scotus disagreed. . Religious Liberty?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307321159113936896?s=20 Thanks, Associate Justice Kagan.Of course, if your daughter excels in high school sports today, forget about a college sports scholarship tomorrow. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the court.Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas dissented.“The Court tries to convince readers that it is merely enforcing the terms of the statute, but that is preposterous. Give what you can...Even ordinary language does not confine terms to their prototypical meaning. Congress could have provided protections for homos, drag-queens and freaks, but it didn’t. But by far the most useless phrase to emerge over the last few years is “Orange Man Bad.”