In 1971, the United States Supreme Court invalidated an Idaho law that required the selection of a man over a woman to serve as administrator of an estate when both were equally qualified. Media. Both Sally Reed and Cecil Reed sued for the right to be the administrator of Richard's estate, which had a value of less than $1000. This "turning point case," as Ruth Bader Ginsburg termed it, began with the suicide of a teenager, Richard Lynn Reed. Reed v. Reed Opinion of the Court by Warren E. Burger. The director for the ACLU, Mel Wulf, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote Sally Reed's brief. After their divorce, Sally raised Skip during his “tender years,” but Cecil was awarded partial custody of Skip when he reached his teens. Court Documents; Case Syllabus: Opinion of the Court: MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. Sally immediately asked her lawyer to appeal, but he refused, telling her that she had no chance of winning. If you would like to submit a question for the panel or Justice Ginsburg, please do so via our,Birth Control & Preventive Services Coverage,Give to one of our Special Funds and Initiatives,Emily Martin, Vice President for Education and Workplace Justice,Entities Claiming Religious Objections Cannot Use Taxpayer Dollars to Deny Foster Care Services to Same-Sex Couples. Cecil Reed put in a rival application.At the time, Idaho law required that “males must be preferred to females” when more than one person was equally qualified to administer an estate. During one of his visits, Skip was found dead in his father’s basement, having apparently shot himself with his father’s rifle. The Probate Court appointed Cecil as administrator, based on Section 15-314 of Idaho's code specifying that "males must be preferred to females," and the court did not consider the issue of capabilities of each parent.Idaho Code section 15-312 also gave preference to brothers over sisters, even listing them in two separate classes (see numbers 4 and 5 of section 312).One of the lawyers for appellant Sally Reed was,The sitting Supreme Court Justices, who found without dissent for the appellant, were,Reed v. Reed: Striking Down Sex Discrimination.Linda Napikoski, J.D., is a journalist and activist specializing in feminism and global human rights.ThoughtCo uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience.

Livraison gratuite le lendemain chez le distributeur européen en Electrique, Automatisme et Câbles. The equal protection clause was designed to invalidate arbitrary discrimination and the law is not in any way narrowly tailored so as to avoid discrimination of minority groups.

Syllabus ; View Case ; Appellant Sally Reed . Posted on November 11, 2012 | Constitutional Law | Tags: Constitutional Law Case Brief. The Reed v. Reed decision marked a historic moment in the fight for women's rights. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. In 1971, Idaho maintained a law that stated that the administrators of estates should be male by preference. Five years later, in.Thanks to Sally Reed, the door was opened for other women and men to successfully challenge discriminatory laws under the Equal Protection Clause, and government laws and practices such as providing widows, but not widowers, survivor’s benefits based on their spouses’ contributions to Social Security; granting men control over marital property; providing welfare benefits to a family when a father, but not a mother, was unemployed; and excluding women from public military colleges were struck down.To participate in the conversation about the panel via Twitter, please use #reedvreed.

Petitioner was a female and sued, seeking an equal right to the administrator-ship. Sally and Cecil Reed were a married couple who had separated because they were in conflict over which of them would be designated as administrator of the estate of their deceased son. Sally Reed’s brief argued that laws that discriminated on the basis of sex, like those that categorized based on race, should be subject to strict judicial scrutiny, because sex, like race, was an inborn characteristic that individuals were powerless to change and because, women, like racial minorities, were historically discriminated against under the law, including by limitation on their ability to own property, serve on juries, hold certain jobs, and, of course, vote. First, the decision ruled that gender discrimination was in violation of the 14th Amendment. The woman who challenged Idaho’s discriminatory statute was Sally Reed, a single mother who earned a … Such laws virtually always failed the more difficult test. Under the law, the father of a deceased child automatically becomes the … In 1971, Idaho maintained a law that stated that the administrators of estates should be male by preference. Reed v. Reed was the first major Supreme Court case that addressed that discrimination based on gender was unconstitutional because it denies equal protection. Did the Idaho probate law violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14.Idaho's mandatory provision preferring males to females reduced the probate court workload by eliminating the need to hold a hearing to determine who was better qualified to administer an estate. 457 S.W.2d 4 (1969) Clyde W. REED, Appellant, v. Jean Moore REED (L. M. Tipton Reed and William E. Scent, Her Attorneys), Appellees. Reed v. Reed. The landmark.The woman who challenged Idaho’s discriminatory statute was Sally Reed, a single mother who earned a living by caring for disabled people in her home.